Understanding How Laws Affect Public Health: An Update on Legal Epidemiology

February 11, 2020 – Laws can have important effects on public health risks and outcomes, while research can provide key evidence to inform effective health-related laws and policies. An introduction to the increasingly influential field of legal epidemiology is presented in a special supplement to the Journal of Public Health Management and Practice (JPHMP). The journal is published in the Lippincott portfolio by Wolters Kluwer.

The supplement is titled Advancing Legal Epidemiology – defined as “the scientific study and deployment of law as a factor in the cause, distribution, and prevention of disease and injury in a population.” Assembling nine original research papers and three expert commentaries, the special issue presents “a compelling and diverse body of research that exemplifies how legal epidemiology can help public health practitioners and policy makers recognize opportunities for achieving better health outcomes through law and policy,” according to an introduction by Betsy L. Thompson, MD, MSPH, DrPH, Director of the Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention (DHDSP) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); and supplement Guest Editors Lindsay K. Cloud, JD, and Lance Gable, JD, MPH.

Evaluating the Evidence for Policies on Community Health Workers

A paper by Erika B. Fulmer, MHA, of the DHDSP and colleagues reports on the use of a policy research continuum, including legal epidemiology, to support the development of a community health worker (CHW) workforce. Incorporating CHWs into healthcare teams is a promising strategy to prevent and control cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes – particularly in disadvantaged groups such as racial/ethnic minorities, people of lower socioeconomic status, and rural populations. “However, there is limited information examining the impact of state CHW policy interventions,” the researchers write.

They applied the DHDSP’s policy research continuum, which incorporates legal epidemiology, to CHW workforce development policies. An early-evidence assessment identified policy interventions with a strong evidence base, while policy surveillance provided an overview of the legal landscape supporting such policies. This enabled implementation studies showing how CHW workforce policies were carried out in different states, including qualitative information on early outcomes.

A future policy impact study will examine short- to long-term outcomes, helping to tailor workforce development strategies and maximize the public health benefits of the CHW approach. The DHDSP’s policy research continuum “can speed development of tools and resources to enhance decision-making and identify interventions to improve public health impact, use resources wisely, and account for dollars spent,” Ms. Fulmer and coauthors write.

Examining the Impact of Pregnancy-Specific Alcohol Policies

A paper by Sarah C.M. Roberts, DrPH, of the University of California, San Francisco and colleagues examines the impact of state-level pregnancy-specific alcohol policies on the health of infants. Using multiple data sources along with original legal research, the analysis included more than 40 years of data with more than 150 million births.

“State-level alcohol pregnancy policy environments have become more punitive over time,” the researchers write. However, few studies have examined whether these policies actually improve health. The new study focused on whether health impacts of pregnancy-specific alcohol policies differ among women at different levels of education, as an indicator of socioeconomic status.

The results suggested that pregnancy-specific alcohol policies were more likely to have harmful health effects in women with higher educational status. More than half of policies studied were linked to increased rates of preterm birth and low birth weight for women who had at least a high school education. These included both supportive policies, such as Mandatory Warning Signs; and punitive policies, such as defining alcohol use during pregnancy as child abuse/neglect.

In contrast, policies related to reporting alcohol use during pregnancy – whether or not this information was used for child welfare purposes – were linked to lower rates of adverse birth outcomes among women with less than a high school education. “Public health professionals should take the lead on identifying and developing policy approaches that reduce harms related to alcohol use during pregnancy,” Dr. Roberts and coauthors conclude.

Co-sponsored by the DHDSP, in collaboration with Temple University’s Center for Public Health Law Research, the JPHMP supplement seeks to introduce the principles and applications of legal epidemiology to the practicing public health community. Drs. Thompson, Cloud, and Gable conclude: “As chronic and noncommunicable health conditions continue to imperil the health of many in our communities, legal epidemiology provides a powerful tool to gain greater insights and pursue more effective public health strategies that will benefit us all.”

Click here to read “Variations by Education Status in Relationships Between Alcohol/Pregnancy Policies and Birth Outcomes and Prenatal Care Utilization.”

DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001069

###

About Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence-based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment; chronic disease prevention and health promotion; and academic-practice linkages.

About Wolters Kluwer

Wolters Kluwer (WKL) is a global leader in professional information, software solutions, and services for the clinicians, nurses, accountants, lawyers, and tax, finance, audit, risk, compliance, and regulatory sectors. We help our customers make critical decisions every day by providing expert solutions that combine deep domain knowledge with advanced technology and services.

Wolters Kluwer reported 2018 annual revenues of €4.3 billion. The group serves customers in over 180 countries, maintains operations in over 40 countries, and employs approximately 18,600 people worldwide. The company is headquartered in Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands.

Wolters Kluwer provides trusted clinical technology and evidence-based solutions that engage clinicians, patients, researchers and students with advanced clinical decision support, learning and research and clinical intelligence. For more information about our solutions, visit http://healthclarity.wolterskluwer.com and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter @WKHealth.

For more information, visit www.wolterskluwer.com, follow us on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

Original post https://alertarticles.info