English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
Esperanto
French
German
Greek
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
UrduEMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 4 P.M. ET, WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2020
Media Contacts:
Renee Tessman, [email protected], (612) 928-6137
M.A. Rosko, [email protected], (612) 928-6169
“During the pandemic, when travel and human contact might not be possible, it’s important to find out if it’s safe and effective for stroke patients to recover at home, using video consultations for their therapy,” said study author Chuancheng Ren, Ph.D., of Fudan University in Shanghai, China. “Our findings are exciting because they suggest remote rehabilitation programs may be more effective than in-person rehabilitation in two ways: on the physical level, with greater increases in physical mobility, and on the brain level, with increased functional brain activity.”
The study involved 52 people with stroke with paralysis on one side of their bodies who had their strokes an average of two weeks before the study. Half were randomly assigned to a home-based telerehabilitation group, half to a conventional outpatient group. All the participants did at least 12 weeks of rehab. For both groups, each session included 60 minutes of occupational and physical therapy, plus 20 minutes of neuromuscular stimulation. All the participants were assessed for both motor function and brain changes at the start of the study, immediately after completion of the rehabilitative sessions and again three months later.
Researchers used a test that measures the recovery of motor skills in the arms and legs after stroke. In this test where an increase of at least 10 points is needed to show meaningful improvement, the group rehabilitating remotely scored an average of 11 points higher than they did at the beginning of the study, while the group receiving conventional in-person rehabilitation scored on average 5.3 points higher.
To measure changes in the brain, researchers used resting-state functional imaging. The remote training group increased their resting state brain connectivity compared to the conventional therapy group.
“We believe the convenience of rehabbing at home may have helped study participants stick to their rehabilitation programs, and that in turn may have helped them recover motor skills better than their conventionally treated peers,” Ren said. “Also, the home environment may have given people more opportunities to participate in, and learn from real-life family activities.”
A limitation of the study is that there was no control group receiving no rehabilitation training, which would have allowed researchers to estimate the amount of recovery that might occur naturally.
This study was supported by Shanghai Strategic Emerging Industries Project Plan and the National Natural Science Foundation of China.
Learn more about stroke at BrainandLife.org, home of the American Academy of Neurology’s free patient and caregiver magazine focused on the intersection of neurologic disease and brain health. Follow Brain & Life® on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
When posting to social media channels about this research, we encourage you to use the hashtags #Neurology and #AANscience.
The American Academy of Neurology is the world’s largest association of neurologists and neuroscience professionals, with over 36,000 members. The AAN is dedicated to promoting the highest quality patient-centered neurologic care. A neurologist is a doctor with specialized training in diagnosing, treating and managing disorders of the brain and nervous system such as Alzheimer’s disease, stroke, migraine, multiple sclerosis, concussion, Parkinson’s disease and epilepsy.
For more information about the American Academy of Neurology, visit AAN.com or find us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn and YouTube.
