English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
Esperanto
French
German
Greek
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Urdu
“Using spatial protein analysis, we looked not only at the types of cells within and around a tumor, but also at their relative positions and how they interact,” said Alex Xu, PhD, a research scientist at Cedars-Sinai Cancer and the Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute at Cedars-Sinai and first author of the study.
Investigators’ analysis of ovarian cancer tissue samples identified patterns consistently associated with patients whose cancer relapsed soon after treatment, Xu said.
“Spatial analysis is the next frontier in tissue biomarker development and our group has demonstrated the importance of spatial analysis in several cancer types,” said Akil Merchant, MD, a senior author of the study and director of the Spatial Molecular Profiling Core facility at Cedars-Sinai Cancer.
High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma is the deadliest form of ovarian cancer, and ovarian cancers are particularly challenging because they are difficult to detect, Xu said. Frequently, patients with these tumors respond to initial treatment with surgery and chemotherapy but the cancer recurs.
In this study, investigators looked at tissue samples from 42 patients who had ovarian cancer—both primary tumors and tumors that recurred after patients’ initial treatment—using a technology called imaging mass cytometry, which reveals the spatial protein content of the tissue. The investigators’ main findings centered around plasma cells, a crucial part of the tumor immune response.
“Our findings suggest that plasma cells are a clinically important factor determining a patient’s time to relapse,” Xu said. “Previous research into their role has been contradictory, with some studies suggesting their presence predicted negative outcomes while others suggested positive outcomes.”
Here investigators found that outcomes were associated with the location of the plasma cells, and their relationship to adjacent cells types.
“Plasma cells were associated with good patient outcomes when lymphoid aggregates, which are structures that include T and B cells, were also abundant in the area immediately surrounding the tumor,” Xu said. “This could be because the plasma cells were part of these organized structures that facilitated communication between these immune cells, thus improving their ability to attack the tumor.”
Plasma cells were linked with poor patient outcomes when cells called cancer-associated fibroblasts, which are known to interfere with the activity of immune cells, were plentiful, which suggested that fibroblasts may be preventing plasma cells from communicating with other immune cells.
“These different microenvironments could account for sometimes differing reports about the role of plasma cells in patient prognosis,” said Dan Theodorescu, MD, PhD, director of Cedars-Sinai Cancer and the PHASE ONE Distinguished Chair. “This avenue of investigation could help us identify biomarkers, or even precision therapies, that improve outcomes for patients with this particularly deadly cancer.”
Other Cedars-Sinai authors participating in the study include Marcela Haro and Ann E. Walts.
Additional authors participating in the study include Ye Hu, Joshi John, Beth Y. Karlan, and Sandra Orsulic.
Funding: SO was supported by the NIH grant R01 CA208753, the United States Department of Veterans Affairs Merit Awards VA-ORD I01 BX004974 and I01 BX006020, the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs through the Ovarian Cancer Research Program Award No. W81XWH2210631, and the Sandy Rollman Ovarian Cancer Foundation. SO and AMX were supported by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) UCLA CTSI Grant Number UL1TR001881.
Read more on the Cedars-Sinai Blog: Ovarian Cancer—The Whispering Cancer
