English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
Esperanto
French
German
Greek
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
UrduThe study, led by a team at McMaster University and published on May 8 in The Lancet Planetary Health, reveals a “triple win”: what is best for patients is also best for the healthcare system and its costs and the environment.
Key highlights of the study include:
- One day in hospital has three times the carbon footprint compared to one day in long-term care. This is significantly greater than home care. Many patients in hospital are waiting for long-term care beds, and the longer they wait, the worse it is for the planet.
- An oversized amount of healthcare resource use, and subsequent carbon footprint, comes in the final year of life. This is because many people spend their final days in a hospital, despite wishing to die at home, surrounded by family. Advanced care directives should be in place early to allow a person to die with dignity, as per their own wishes.
To speak with the authors, contact them directly:
Myles Sergeant, lead author and associate clinical professor, Department of Family Medicine at McMaster University [email protected]
Sonia Anand, co-author and associate vice-president, Global Health at McMaster University [email protected]
Quotes for use in coverage:
“Environmental sustainability is a lens we can look through across the life-course, including end-of-life care decision-making. We know that dying in hospital is resource-heavy, and more importantly, not the place where Canadians want to spend their final days. Finding solutions that help people age and pass away peacefully in their home is ideal. It’s good for the individual and their family, more affordable for the health system, and better for our planet. A rare triple-win.” – Myles Sergeant
“This analysis shows us just how important it is for clinicians to have end-of-life care discussions with their patients, to honour their wishes, which in many cases will also reduce the carbon footprint.” – Sonia Anand
