In 1986, a ballot measure titled California’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act went into effect. Better known to the public as Proposition 65, this right-to-know law requires companies to warn consumers if their products might expose people to chemicals that may cause cancer or developmental or reproductive harm. The law requires the state to maintain a list of such chemicals, which has grown to include more than 900 entries. But beyond requiring companies to issue warnings meant to inform, and potentially influence, consumers, has Proposition 65 changed industry behaviors as well? Jennifer Ohayon and colleagues set out to answer this question.
The researchers interviewed 37 people from some of the largest companies across industries affected by the law, including manufacturers, retailers, consultants and trade association representatives. The interviews revealed that many companies reformulated products to remove any chemical covered by Proposition 65 to avoid warnings and potential lost sales. Because these reformulated products are sold nationwide, companies also avoided having to make California-specific products. In addition, the team found that the law prompted many companies to dig deeper into their supply chains and discover exactly which chemicals were going into their products to avoid potential lawsuits over nondisclosed chemicals.
However, Proposition 65 still has room for improvement. The list of chemicals covered by the law isn’t exhaustive — notably, many per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are not included — and it takes time to add new ones. As a result, in some cases manufacturers have reformulated a product to remove the Proposition 65 chemicals only to replace them with an unlisted chemical that might also be harmful but doesn’t require a warning.
In all, the researchers say this study helps provide a behind-the-scenes look at some of the downstream effects of Proposition 65 on several industries. “Our study shows that by increasing businesses’ awareness of harmful chemicals in the supply chain, Proposition 65 has caused them to shift away from using toxic substances, and that’s a positive step for public health,” concludes Ohayon.
The authors acknowledge funding from the California Breast Cancer Research Program.
###
The American Chemical Society (ACS) is a nonprofit organization chartered by the U.S. Congress. ACS’ mission is to advance the broader chemistry enterprise and its practitioners for the benefit of Earth and all its people. The Society is a global leader in promoting excellence in science education and providing access to chemistry-related information and research through its multiple research solutions, peer-reviewed journals, scientific conferences, e-books and weekly news periodical Chemical & Engineering News. ACS journals are among the most cited, most trusted and most read within the scientific literature; however, ACS itself does not conduct chemical research. As a leader in scientific information solutions, its CAS division partners with global innovators to accelerate breakthroughs by curating, connecting and analyzing the world’s scientific knowledge. ACS’ main offices are in Washington, D.C., and Columbus, Ohio.
Registered journalists can subscribe to the ACS journalist news portal on EurekAlert! to access embargoed and public science press releases. For media inquiries, contact [email protected].
Note: ACS does not conduct research but publishes and publicizes peer-reviewed scientific studies.
Follow us: Facebook | LinkedIn | Instagram
![withyou android app](https://sciencenewsnet.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/viber_image_2023-09-16_21-44-30-623.png)