The findings, published in Behavioural Ecology, suggest that iridescence provides camouflage independent of glossiness, which means that it is the colour of iridescent surfaces and its changeability, that is the most important aspect of iridescence in enabling camouflage.
Iridescence is a type of structural colouration that produces bright, vibrant hues. These are often angle-dependent, meaning the observed colour appears to change depending on the viewing angle.
Lead author Dylan Thomas from Bristol’s School of Biological Sciences, said: “This is somewhat surprising. Recent theories had suggested prey target gloss could be important in concealment, but our findings actually suggest the opposite to be true.
“In other words, perhaps glossiness isn’t as important to camouflage as had previously been suggested.”
The team produced artificial beetle targets and pinned these to trees in Leigh Woods in Bristol and observed how well they survived under predation by natural bird predators.
Half were sprayed with a glossy fixative and half a matt fixative. They were fixed to ivy leaves, placing a mealworm between the target and the leaf, and secured against tree roots or trunks. The targets were checked at 24-hour intervals over a 96-hour period for signs of bird predation – if the mealworm had been eaten, the target was classed as having been predated.
When collecting targets, they also selected the background leaves for analysis as a previous study had found that background gloss has a significant effect on target survival.
Dylan explained: “Our results provide further evidence that iridescent colouration can provide effective camouflage.
“They also support previous findings that background glossiness has a significant effect on target survival – when targets are on a glossy background, their survival is enhanced.”
Now the team plan to further explore why so many beetle species are glossy, given it is detrimental to their survival when combined with iridescence.
They will also look at why black targets seem to survive well (second behind iridescence), the effects of background gloss and how lighting conditions affect how iridescence and gloss are perceived.
Dylan concluded: “Our findings contribute to a widening literature on camouflaging iridescence and help us to better understand the role this distinctive form of colouration can have in concealment.
“Our findings have also opened many avenues for further research, many of which are important not just to iridescence as camouflage but to camouflage as a whole.”
Paper:
‘Interactions between colour and gloss in iridescent camouflage’ by Dylan Thomas et al in Behavioural Ecology.