Controversial police bills of rights don’t lead to more civilian fatalities

ITHACA, N.Y. – Law enforcement officers’ bills of rights, known as LEOBRs, don’t result in an increase in police-related fatalities, according to new research from Cornell University professor Jamein Cunningham.

In the wake of several recent high-profile police killings of unarmed civilians, LEOBRs—adopted by 19 states—are receiving heightened scrutiny from activists and legal scholars. Are these laws, which limit the accountability of officers, leading to extreme use of force? 

The answer is no, according to Cunningham, an economics professor in Cornell’s Brooks School of Public Policy, and his collaborators. An article about their findings, “Law Enforcement Officers’ Bills of Rights and Police Violence,” was published by the American Economic Association. 

Opponents of LEOBRs say their limitations on who can lead an investigation, the length of an investigation, officer access to evidence, limits on the scope of disciplinary action and restrictions on external oversight could result in a lack of accountability for inappropriate use of lethal force, resulting in an uptick in civilian fatalities. 

Proponents say the nature of police work can result in unwarranted complaints. 

For additional information, see this Cornell Chronicle story.Cornell University has dedicated television and audio studios available for media interviews supporting full HD, ISDN and web-based platforms.-30-

withyou android app