AMES, Iowa – New data from an international research team adds another dimension – literally – to understanding the economic and environmental impacts of how cities are built.
The pioneering new data set shows the vast differences in the height of built-up infrastructure in urban areas across the globe, information that could improve projections of energy use and emissions and inform city planning and economic development efforts, including progression toward the United Nations sustainable development goals, said Yuyu Zhou, associate professor of geological and atmospheric sciences at Iowa State University and a co-author of the study, released today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences, the academy’s peer-reviewed journal.
“This is a new way to measure urban areas,” Zhou said. “Now we can answer some questions we couldn’t answer before about city development and building a more equitable and sustainable future.”
Using radar data collected by the European Space Agency’s Sentinel-1 satellite, cross-referenced with numerous other data sets, researchers calculated the average height of built-up structures in individual 500-by-500 meter squares within urban areas, filtering out natural features such as trees. They then used the height measurements to estimate per capita infrastructure volumes for each country and the level of infrastructure inequality within countries.
One of the most surprising takeaways from the measurements, which are based on 2015 data, is the infrastructure divide between the Global North (which includes the U.S., Canada, Europe, Russia, Japan and Australia) and the Global South (Africa, South America, Central America, the Middle East and most of Asia, including China). Zhou said he didn’t expect such a severe disparity.
Despite having 16% of the overall population, the 45 Global North nations studied have nearly as much urban built-up infrastructure as the 114 Global South nations. Nine out of 10 humans live in a country with less per capita infrastructure than the Global North average. The U.S. has more than 600 cubic meters of urban infrastructure for every person, while the least built-up countries have far less, such as Bangladesh’s 20 cubic meters per person.
“A 30-times difference is huge, and that’s important in understanding inequality,” Zhou said.
Denser, taller buildings correlate with economic growth, and three-quarters of the U.N. sustainable development goals are influenced directly or indirectly by infrastructure. Grasping the enormity of the global infrastructure gap and mapping it with tangible measurements can guide policymakers as they consider development strategies, Zhou said.
The infrastructure atlas also is useful in looking at the differences in urban build-up within countries. An inequality index the researchers used shows infrastructure is spread less equitably in the Global South than in the Global North, though the divide is much less pronounced than the difference in overall infrastructure. The U.S., for instance, has slightly larger infrastructure inequality than the global average, the study found.
“The size of the infrastructure gap suggests that we need to make much more progress towards ensuring access to infrastructure and reducing inequalities within and between countries,” said Karen Seto, the Frederick C. Hixon Professor of Geography and Urbanization Science at Yale University and co-author of the study. “This new data set will help identify populations that are underserved by infrastructure.”
The atlas also will assist scientists in better understanding how cities contribute to climate change. Knowing infrastructure needs helps project the demand for energy-intensive building materials, and more vertical cities see lower energy use for transportation. Detailed information about height variations will improve three-dimensional studies of urban forms.
“With this data, we can significantly improve large-scale climate modeling in urban areas,” Zhou said.
Other members of the research team include Wei Chen, Iowa State doctoral student; Peng Gong, University of Hong Kong; Xuecao Li, a former Iowa State post-doctoral researcher now at China Agricultural University; Lin Meng, a former Iowa State doctoral student now at Vanderbilt University; and Qiusheng Wu, University of Tennessee.
