August 30, 2022 – Hospital admission is a worthwhile time to ask patients whether they usually have sufficient food at home, then connect them to community resources if necessary. That conclusion comes from a quality improvement project by Dr. Emily Gore, a recent graduate of the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, and colleagues. They describe their project in The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality that is published in the Lippincott portfolio by Wolters Kluwer.
In primary care clinics and emergency rooms, nurses often ask patients about economic and social conditions that may be affecting their health, such as housing instability and intimate partner violence. A condition that’s less emphasized in those places—and even less so during hospital admissions—is food insecurity. That term refers to reduced quality, variety, or desirability of food, or inadequate access to food.
“Although our hospital serves a population with a high prevalence of food insecurity, no process previously existed to universally screen patients,” Gore and co-authors explain. To test whether they could improve that situation, they trained nurses in a 26-bed unit to add two items to their intake interview when patients were admitted to the hospital:
- Within the past 12 months, you were worried that your food would run out before you got the money to buy more
- Within the past 12 months, the food you bought just didn’t last and you didn’t have money to get more
Patients were asked to respond “never true,” “sometimes true,” or “often true.”
Impact of food insecurity
The quality improvement project began on June 7, 2021. Over the next 28 weeks, an average of 61% of patients were asked about food insecurity each week. In contrast, before the project started, only 2% of patients per week, on average, had been asked about food insecurity.
“[S]uccess was sustained despite challenges with nursing staff turnover and staff shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic,” the authors note.
During the first 28 weeks of the project, 6% of patients answered “sometimes true” or “often true” to one or both questions, meaning they screened positive. Their nurse consulted a social worker, who gave the patients a list of community food resources.
“A reduction in food insecurity is expected to reduce healthcare costs and improve overall patient health, including cardiometabolic risk and [blood sugar] control,” Gore and her colleagues say. They are working now to incorporate screening for food insecurity across other units at their hospital. “[W]e also plan to connect patients to a hospital-based food pantry service—an effort that has demonstrated success at other institutions.”
Next steps to improve food insecurity
The food insecurity project is reported in a special issue of JHQ designed to highlight successful approaches to improving the health of underserved or marginalized populations. “[O]ur nation continues to underperform on [several quality and patient safety] measures,” according to the editors of the issue, Allyson G. Hall, PhD and Michael J. Mugavero, MD, MHSc of the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
The editors stress that economic and social conditions “have great impact on whether individuals and their communities experience worse health outcomes relative to other individuals and communities.” They call the articles in the special issue “valuable lessons for those working to improve health equity.”
DOI: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000350
###
About The Journal for Healthcare Quality
The Journal for Healthcare Quality a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. JHQ publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation.
About the National Association for Healthcare Quality
Founded in 1976, the National Association for Healthcare Quality is the leader in the development of industry-standard healthcare quality competencies and certification in healthcare quality. NAHQ provides a strategic advantage to healthcare quality professionals and healthcare organizations in their quest to reduce variability in care delivery and drive value through improved outcomes. It offers the only accredited certification in healthcare quality, the Certified Professional in Healthcare Quality—the CPHQ®. Today, nearly 14,000 healthcare professionals hold the CPHQ® globally.
About Wolters Kluwer
Wolters Kluwer (WKL) is a global leader in professional information, software solutions, and services for the clinicians, nurses, accountants, lawyers, and tax, finance, audit, risk, compliance, and regulatory sectors. We help our customers make critical decisions every day by providing expert solutions that combine deep domain knowledge with advanced technology and services.
Wolters Kluwer reported 2021 annual revenues of €4.8 billion. The group serves customers in over 180 countries, maintains operations in over 40 countries, and employs approximately 19,800 people worldwide. The company is headquartered in Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands.
Wolters Kluwer provides trusted clinical technology and evidence-based solutions that engage clinicians, patients, researchers and students in effective decision-making and outcomes across healthcare. We support clinical effectiveness, learning and research, clinical surveillance and compliance, as well as data solutions. For more information about our solutions, visit https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/health and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter @WKHealth.
For more information, visit www.wolterskluwer.com, follow us on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and YouTube.
