Efficient technology for splitting the hydrogen-oxygen bond in water could be the key to producing low-cost, green hydrogen for energy storage at an industrial scale. Green hydrogen is expected to play a significant role in achieving the target of net zero carbon dioxide emissions. In a new study, an interdisciplinary group of researchers have identified a way to use “defect engineering” to significantly boost catalytic efficiency, taking science one step closer to sustainable, green hydrogen production.
Electrocatalysts are utilized in the production of green hydrogen through water electrolysis. During this process, pyrochlore catalysts drive the oxygen evolution reaction at the anode, while hydrogen is generated at the cathode. This artwork, which was selected as a cover for the Journal of the American Chemical Society, highlights the design of solid-state structures based on defect engineering principles to achieve enhanced catalytic activity. Provided by Yang/Ghosh.
Clean hydrogen can be produced using solar and wind energy through electrochemical reactions from water. In a typical device, known as proton exchange membrane electrolyzer, water molecules are broken down into hydrogen and oxygen gases at two electrodes using electricity: hydrogen gas is harnessed at one side (cathode), and oxygen is released as the only by-product at the opposite electrode (anode). One of the challenges of the current process is that while hydrogen gas can be generated quickly, oxygen gas is produced much more slowly. This limits the flow of the electrical current – and gas production – because the overall production is limited by the slow part of the reaction.
In this project, the researchers designed a new complex oxide material to serve as a catalyst for the electrolyzer to speed up the generation of oxygen. This advancement, in turn, is expected to lead to a more efficient flow of electric current and higher production rate of green hydrogen.
Led by chemical and biomolecular engineering professor Hong Yang, the researchers used ruthenium to form the base of a new complex oxide electrocatalyst with a pyrochlore mineral structure. They employed a technique called defect engineering to alter the electronic structure of ruthenium by partially introducing yttrium to the reactive site.
“Instead of creating a perfect solid, introducing a number of atoms as ‘defects’ to the reactive site allows us to create a better catalyst,” said Yang.
Though unusual in the design of electrocatalysts, defect engineering is common in computer chips: “impurities” are added to silicon, which improves the performance. Without trace amounts of other atoms, silicon by itself does not work well or at all, Yang explained. The team was able to use this approach to explore the effect of different compositions of an electrocatalyst on reactivity and stability of the electrode for the generation of oxygen gas.
They showed that replacing a certain number of ruthenium atoms with yttrium boosted the oxygen generation activity. Using a tool called thermogravimetric analysis in materials science and engineering professor Nicola Perry’s group, the team was able to quantify how much oxygen vacancy was created in the electrocatalysts with different compositions and, in turn, determine what role the oxygen vacancy and metal elements played in the improved activity.
“Initially, I expected that the oxygen concentration in the molecule might increase, and that may have an effect on the performance.” said Bidipta Ghosh, a graduate student in chemical engineering and the paper’s first author.
However, the thermogravimetric analysis – carried out by co-author En Ju Cho, a researcher in Perry’s group – showed that the quantitative value of the oxygen in their material remained constant.
“It turns out that it was the oxidation state that got changed,” Ghosh said.
“One cannot just randomly create a less-perfect material and expect improved performance,” Yang said. “Just like in silicon chips, the level and type of imperfections in an electrocatalyst must be carefully controlled. We not only identify what we should do, we also figure out to what degree we should do it to achieve the maximum activity.”
The team was able to experimentally identify the kind of electronic configuration change of ruthenium that created the enhanced reaction activity. Leveraging X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis carried out in the group of Andreas Klein at TU Darmstadt and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy at the School of Chemical Sciences, they showed that in this process, excess yttrium in ruthenium site are primarily balanced by the change of electronic charges on active atoms, while the amount of missing oxygen atoms is unchanged in the electrocatalysts. In other words, yttrium optimized the performance of the electrocatalyst through changing the electronic structure of ruthenium, without impacting the number of missing oxygen atoms.
To reach these conclusions, Yang said that the interdisciplinary nature of the team was essential in allowing them to overcome several technical challenges in characterization.
“The success of this work is only possible through close collaborations with our able experts in related fields,” said Yang.
The collaborators include Cheng Zhang and Yujie Yang in the Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering; En Ju Cho and Nicola Perry in the Department of Materials Science & Engineering; and Toby Woods in the School of Chemical Sciences – all at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign – and Stefanie Frick and Andreas Klein in the Department of Electronic Structure of Materials, Institute of Materials Science, at the Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany.
The U.S. National Science Foundation (CBET-2055734) and German Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, KL1225/11-1) supported this work.
