Stuck in the Rough: How Aging Reactor Walls May Exhibit Lower Erosion

Surface maps and line scans (represented by yellow lines) of topology and aluminum (Al) composition on a rough carbon sample (experiment at top vs. model at bottom). Regions shadowed from incoming helium (He) ions (yellow and magenta arrows) are shaded.

Surface maps and line scans (represented by yellow lines) of topology and aluminum (Al) composition on a rough carbon sample (experiment at top vs. model at bottom). Regions shadowed from incoming helium (He) ions (yellow and magenta arrows) are shaded.
Image credit: Abe, S. et al., Computational investigation of ion incident angles and material erosion of micro-rough graphite and silicon carbide divertor surfaces. Physics of Plasmas 29, 102503 (2022).

The Science

As the plasma circulates in a fusion device, the surface of the device that faces the plasma erodes. This releases particles of surface material. Most erosion occurs through a process called sputtering, where a particle strikes a surface and results in the ejection of atoms from that surface. The number of atoms eroded for each incident particle, known as the sputtering yield, varies depending on the angle at which the incident particle contacts the surface. In a fusion device, the trajectory of the incident particle does not necessarily change over time. However, processes such as erosion, deposition, and melting of the wall result in localized changes to the angle at which the particle bombards the surface. Most models used to estimate erosion of the plasma-facing wall assume that the smoothness of the surface does not change with time. To test this assumption, scientists studied laboratory-scale plasma devices to examine the relationship between surface roughness and erosion.

The Impact

Designing, building, and installing a plasma-facing wall with low erosion and minimal surface damage is critical for future fusion power reactors. As the plasma-facing surface erodes away, the surface releases unwanted impurities into the plasma. This compromises the device’s performance and reduces the lifespan of its components. Scientists rely on empirical models to predict the rate of erosion in fusion devices. These models are based on real-world observations rather than mathematical descriptions. Now, new research builds on previous studies to examine the erosion behavior of rough surfaces in a tokamak. Its goal is to more accurately approximate a realistic fusion environment. The research aims to revise existing models to account for the dramatic changes in sputtering yield caused by continuous roughening of the plasma-facing surface.

Summary

Erosion and deposition of the plasma-facing wall are expected to change throughout the reactor lifetime as the surface undergoes various types of mechanical and thermal damage. Researchers at the DIII-D National Fusion Facility, a Department of Energy (DOE) user facility, used erosion measurements from graphite and silicon carbide samples with varying degrees of roughness taken during a recent experiment to develop an empirical model that estimates erosion based on surface topology. The team included scientists from Princeton University, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, San Diego State University, and General Atomics.

The researchers used three-dimensional measurements of surface topology and composition taken before and after exposure in DIII-D to provide key inputs to a sputtering simulation code that was used to estimate the rates of erosion and deposition, as well as the fraction of the surface shadowed from incident particles. They attributed a reduction in the sputtering yield from rough surfaces of up to 50 percent to local changes to the angle at which incoming particles strike the surface. On average, they calculated the sputtering yield for a rough surface was at 75 percent of that for a smooth surface. By quantifying the relationship between the surface topology and the sputtering yield of the material using computer modeling, scientists will be able to more accurately predict the erosion of rough surfaces, which are expected to evolve significantly throughout the lifetime of a fusion device.

Contact

Shota Abe
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
[email protected]

Funding

This work was supported by the Department of Energy Office of Science, Office of Fusion Energy Sciences, using the DIII-D National Fusion Facility, a DOE Office of Science user facility.

Publications

Abe, S. et al., Computational investigation of ion incident angles and material erosion of micro-rough graphite and silicon carbide divertor surfacesPhysics of Plasmas 29, 102503 (2022). [DOI: 10.1063/5.0095155]

Scraped from https://www.sourcearu.com

withyou android app