Washington, D.C., August 22–Urbanization in Ghana has spurred growth in nonfarm jobs in rural areas with little impact on agricultural intensification, defined by higher land productivity. Simultaneously, neglect of public investments, low even by African standards, in the non-cocoa sector has stagnated agricultural growth in the country. These are some of the key findings of a new book from International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) researchers and collaborators.
The book, titled,
Ghana’s Economic and Agricultural Transformation: Past Performance and Future Prospects
, co-edited by IFPRI’s
; and independent researchers, Peter Hazell and Shashidhara Kolavalli, offers key insights into harnessing agriculture’s potential in the country. “Ghana presents an important case study to understand the challenges and opportunities for Africa’s economic transformation,” said IFPRI Senior Research Fellow and co-editor
. The book integrates economic and political analysis to explore the challenges and opportunities of African nation’s transformation.
Ghana’s Economic and Agricultural Transformation
reveals that despite over 30 years of continuous growth in per capita income and rapid urbanization, Ghana has not been able to industrialize and most of its workers are trapped in traditional or low productivity agriculture or low productivity jobs in the services sector. Using a wide range of primary and secondary data at multiple scales, the book examines Ghana’s overall economic performance since the major Structural Adjustment Program in the mid-1980s and provides an in-depth empirical analysis of the performance of the agricultural sector and broader economy over the past four decades.
The book’s ten chapters offer important takeaways with vast implications for policymakers and practitioners. Among them is the key insight that raising land productivity in agriculture is one of the few options available for helping to transform the national economy and ensuring future growth in per capita incomes.
Also, urbanization has not kick-started agricultural intensification. Urbanization is often hypothesized to induce agricultural intensification as farmers respond to increased demand for their products but face growing competition for their land. However, this has not been the case in Ghana. As rural wages have gone up, people have shifted to more non-farm jobs, adopted labor saving technologies in farming like mechanization and herbicides, and found more land to bring into cultivation. “The result has been a substantial decline in the share of households that depend primarily on agriculture, an increase in agricultural labor productivity, but only a modest increase in land productivity,” said Xinshen Diao, co-editor and Deputy Director of the Development, Strategy and Governance Division at IFPRI.
This pattern of agricultural growth could present problems for the future. “Without investing in agricultural intensification, increased production will depend on further expansion of the cropped area, either by clearing virgin forest or reducing the length of traditional fallow periods,” said Hazell (former director, Development Strategy and Governance Division at IFPRI), and co-editor of the book. “These alternatives for expanding food production are not only environmentally damaging, but they are also reaching their limit – there is simply not much virgin forest land left to convert to cropping and any further reduction of fallow periods will only worsen soil degradation and slow crop yield growth.”
In addition to this lack of intensification, the book finds that public investments outside the cocoa sector have been insufficient. “Public investment plays a crucial role in promoting agricultural growth and shaping distributional outcomes,” said Sam Benin, a chapter author and deputy division director of IFPRI’s Africa Region. “In Ghana, agricultural subsectors outside of cocoa–including all the country’s food staples–have been neglected.”
The result? Ghana has been unable to compete with imports like rice, poultry, and processed foods, or to grow additional agricultural exports beyond cocoa. This failure to enhance exports or import substitutes means the country is missing out on creating jobs, boosting national per capita income, absorbing a growing labor force and enabling more workers to shift out of traditional agriculture.
This lopsided public spending has even broader implications for value chains: The lack of improved seeds, credit, quality control, effective farmer organizations and public-private partnerships could all be stemmed through more proactive government intervention. Former country leader of IFPRI’s Ghana Strategy Support Program and the book’s co-editor, Shashidhara Kolavalli said, “The experience of Ghana’s Cocoa Board (CocoBOD) indicates that selective interventions could be beneficial to develop many other agricultural value chains.”
“In order for the Ghanaian government and other African countries to harness the transformative potential of agriculture, more effort will be needed to strengthen relationships with business and target scarce resources to selected value chains with the greatest growth and employment potential,” said Danielle Resnick. Ultimately, the book emphasizes that long-term commitments to transforming the agriculture sector require good governance.
Ghana has been viewed as one of Africa’s political and economic success stories, from maintaining a multi-party democracy, peace and social cohesion to reducing poverty and growing its middle class. These developments, combined with continuous growth over the past 30 more years, demonstrates the country’s unique capabilities. However, to ensure adequate and decent jobs for its population in today’s changing global environment, Ghana needs to find opportunities to bolster economic transformation. Targeted investments in agriculture offer one of these opportunities if both public and private actors adjust course accordingly.
The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) seeks sustainable solutions for ending hunger and poverty. IFPRI was established in 1975 to identify and analyze alternative national and international strategies and policies for meeting the food needs of the developing world, with particular emphasis on low-income countries and on the poorer groups in those countries Visit:
This part of information is sourced from https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2019-08/ifpr-nbr082119.php