English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
Esperanto
French
German
Greek
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
UrduThe new study, led by Xinxin Han, PhD, MS, of Tsinghua University School of Medicine, Beijing, China, analyzed 16 years of nationally representative, hospital-level data from the American Hospital Association annual survey, 2003 to 2018. They compared three different types of state legislations aimed at ensuring adequate nurse staffing:
- Mandated staffing ratios: setting established minimum nurse-to-patient staffing ratios at hospitals.
- Staffing committees: requiring hospitals to establish committees, including at least 50 percent RNs, to develop a nurse staffing plan based on patient needs.
- Public reporting: requiring hospitals to make staffing data available to the public, with the goal of putting market pressure on understaffed hospitals to improve staffing ratios.
The effects of the three legislative approaches were analyzed, controlling for hospital- and state-level factors. The analysis included data on approximately 425 hospitals in one state (California) with mandated staffing ratios, 1,000 hospitals in seven states that legislated staffing committees, 325 hospitals in five states that legislated public reporting, and 3,400 hospitals in states with no nurse staffing legislation.
Consistent with previous studies, the California law setting mandated staffing ratios led to a significant increase in RN staffing: by about 1 hour per patient per day. The staffing mandate also brought a small increase in staffing by nursing assistive personnel (NAPs), who assist with patient care under the supervision of RNs (about 0.25 hour per patient), but had no effect on LPN staffing.
In the main analysis, staffing committees and public reporting had no effect on RN or NAP staffing. The staffing committee approach had a small negative effect on LPN staffing, while public reporting had a small positive effect.
The report is the first national study comparing the effects of alternative policy approaches to increasing hospital nurse staffing. The findings support the positive effects of California’s mandated staffing ratios, and suggest the need to identify ways that the two alternative approaches – staffing committees and public reporting – might be strengthened. Further research is also needed to answer the critical question about the impact of nurse staffing laws: whether they lead to improvements in patient outcomes.
The study is part of a special supplement presenting new insights on the role of health workforce in achieving health equity. “There is no healthcare without the people who provide service,” according to an introductory article by Patricia (Polly) Pittman, PhD, and colleagues of the Milken Institute School of Public Health at George Washington University. “As such, the health workforce has a central role in addressing (or maintaining) health disparities.”
Dr. Pittman and colleagues outline a health workforce equity framework, including six interconnected equity domains: the diversity of people entering the workforce, whether their training is grounded in the idea of social mission, whether they locate in rural and underserved areas, whether they provide service to those most in need, such as Medicaid beneficiaries, whether they practice in ways that acknowledge and help address social determinants of health, and whether the health workers themselves work under fair and safe conditions.
These domains are determined by “a complex ecosystem of policies, programs, and practices driven by stakeholder interests,” Dr. Pittman and colleagues argue. They believe their framework can help to guide further research, interventions, and policy to ensure that the health workforce plays a positive role in advancing health equity.
Click to read “Health Workforce for Health Equity”
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001609
###
About Medical Care
Rated as one of the top ten journals in health care administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of health care. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of health care. Medical Care provides timely reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services. In addition, numerous special supplementary issues that focus on specialized topics are produced with each volume. Medical Care is the official journal of the Medical Care Section of the American Public Health Association.
About Wolters Kluwer
Wolters Kluwer (WKL) is a global leader in professional information, software solutions, and services for the clinicians, nurses, accountants, lawyers, and tax, finance, audit, risk, compliance, and regulatory sectors. We help our customers make critical decisions every day by providing expert solutions that combine deep domain knowledge with advanced technology and services.
Wolters Kluwer reported 2020 annual revenues of €4.6 billion. The group serves customers in over 180 countries, maintains operations in over 40 countries, and employs approximately 19,200 people worldwide. The company is headquartered in Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands.
Wolters Kluwer provides trusted clinical technology and evidence-based solutions that engage clinicians, patients, researchers and students in effective decision-making and outcomes across healthcare. We support clinical effectiveness, learning and research, clinical surveillance and compliance, as well as data solutions. For more information about our solutions, visit https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/health and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter @WKHealth.
For more information, visit www.wolterskluwer.com, follow us on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and YouTube.
