Ecosystem destruction endangers local soy agriculture in Brazil

Destroying tropical ecosystems and replacing them with soybeans and other crops has immediate and devastating consequences for soybeans, according to new peer-reviewed research in the journal

World Development

. With 35.8 million hectare currently under soy cultivation in Brazil, extreme heat–which adjacent tropical forests help keep in check–has reduced soybean income by an average of approximately US$100 per hectare per year.

The study,

Conserving the Cerrado and Amazon biomes of Brazil protects the soy economy from damaging warming

, shows that protecting the Amazon and Cerrado can prevent the sort of high temperatures that damages the productivity of crops–estimated to cost the sector US$3.55 billion.

Another recent study found annual agricultural losses associated with deforestation-driven declines in precipitation at

US$1 billion

. Taken together, the two estimates reveal the massive economic impacts of destroying ecosystems on Brazil’s agricultural sector; the annual losses are likely to be even higher than $US4.55 billion, which is only a conservative estimate.

“Destroying forests and other ecosystems instantly turns up the heat and reduces precipitation in the immediate vicinity where the destruction takes place, scorching soybean plants and inflicting great harm on the sector’s profitability,” said Rafaela Flach, the study’s lead author.

“The economic fallout is big–and getting bigger, with serious impacts on global and local economics and food security. It’s a local problem with global ramifications, and it’s happening in tropical regions worldwide.”

The research comes as Brazil faces its

worst drought in almost a century

, while deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon has also expanded dramatically, setting

new records

for each of the past three months. With the fire season fast approaching, the overall trend has been one of accelerated ecosystem destruction with scant protection offered by the government. In three years, the Bolsonaro Administration has weakened 57 environmental laws, slashing environmental fines for illegal operations by 70% from March 2020 to August 2020 alone.

Scientists already have a well-established understanding of how tropical deforestation contributes to global climate change through emitting carbon and reducing the ability of the world’s forests to take more carbon out of the atmosphere. A new body of research is emerging, showing how tropical deforestation has climate impacts beyond carbon: Deforestation immediately increases extreme heat locally and decreases regional and local rainfall.

These cascading impacts parch soil and harm crops and livestock, threatening agriculture both nearby and far away–with billion-dollar ramifications, as the report shows.

“The economic impacts of deforestation on extreme heat and reduced rainfall taken in isolation are troubling. But when we look at the impacts together and include climate change, the total effect can be overwhelming to the economy,” said Flach. “While the global impacts should not be underestimated, the damage from ecosystem loss already being done to the Brazilian economy alone is severe.”

In the new research, scientists analyzed the value of native vegetation in providing extreme heat regulation for soy production using two complementary approaches: soy revenue lost from the destruction of forests and other ecosystems and soy revenue gained from the conservation of these ecosystems.

For the analysis focused on ecosystem loss, they estimated the increased exposure to extreme heat for the amount of vegetation that was removed. For the conservation analysis, they modeled the value of standing forests and other ecosystems based on estimated regulation of extreme heat.

Soybean cultivation has

expanded dramatically in Brazil

, which is now the world’s largest producer with 37% of global market share. Brazilian farmers have increased crop yields per hectare–from 1.7 to 3.2 tons per hectare between 1990 and 2019–while also expanding the land being planted–from 11.5 to 35.8 million ha between 1990 and 2019.

By 2019, soy constituted 49% of Brazilian cropland area and 41% of agricultural revenues. The two new studies reveal that farmers would have increased yields even more if they had not deforested, which would have held extreme heat at bay and maintained rainfall.

“The good news is that there’s a win-win here. In the past and even today a lot of land is cleared to the detriment of food production and the climate” said Dr. Michael Obersteiner, a study co-author and the Director of the Environmental Change Institute at the University of Oxford. “The soy sector has a powerful opportunity to reduce this risk by stopping deforestation. In so doing, they benefit their industry–to say nothing of the major contribution to slowing global climate change.”

###